Academic papers aren’t written in a single night. To get all of your academic juices flowing in the proper direction, they must be written several times, revised, and edited numerous times. According to evidence, 21% of papers are rejected without peer review, while 40% of papers are apparently rejected after peer review.

Rejection occurs to the best of us, but it may also act as a learning experience. Don’t pull your letter to shreds or throw your computer on the ground if you get a rejection e-mail. Don’t be devastated and vow to never write another paper. This is true even for the most experienced researchers.

Even after their credibility and expertise have been established, experienced researchers face rejection for their papers. As a result, we recommend that researchers focus on their options after rejection rather than avoiding rejection.

As a result, we recommend that researchers focus on their options after rejection rather than avoiding rejection.

1. Deal with your emotions

Rejection is never easy to cope with, and it’s more difficult in the start of your career. It’s best if you acknowledge your feelings and use the healthiest coping mechanisms available, such as relaxing with a cup of hot beverage and music, contacting your closest friend, or receiving a hug from your children or dog.

This will calm your nerves and allow you to rationally evaluate your rejection.

2. Read the Rejection Letter

Carefully read the rejection letter. Don’t just read the topic line or scan it. All of your questions should be answered in the rejection letter, and it’s surprising how many authors ask their friends or professors questions that should have been answered in the letter.

In the middle of a surge in journal article submissions, journal editors evaluate the articles and determine their relevance for the journal’s audience, compare them to recent publications or future approved papers, as well as the journal’s overall quality. If a document fails to pass this initial evaluation, it is likely to be rejected without further review.

Review the rejection remarks because they will tell you how to resubmit your paper.

Papers that pass the first round of processing are sent out for peer review. If they are rejected in peer review, they generally contain detailed comments from the reviewers on the strengths and weaknesses of the paper.

3. Follow the Author instructions 

Many papers that do not meet the author guidelines in terms of word limit, style, formatting, and number of tables and figures will be rejected right away in the review process for many journals. The number of author instructions continues to grow, and they aren’t always the friendliest of instructions.

If your paper deviates from the rules, provide a cover letter with your submission that explains the deviations and why you made those. Make sure your justifications aren’t hollow and truly add to the relevance of the article’s real issue.

When you submit a manuscript that does not follow the author guidelines, you risk annoying the journal editors and, as a result, delaying your work’s review.

4. Paper should be matched to the journal

A mismatch between the paper and the scope of the journal, which is closely related to the journal’s target audience, is a common reason for internal rejection of submitted papers.

Even if the title gives you an idea of what the journal is about, go to the website to learn more about the published kind of articles.

Read one or two journal issues to get a sense of the most common themes, research designs, and authors. Thus, before submitting your paper, it is highly recommended that you check a few journal issues for content and format

5. Resubmitting to the same journal

If the problems mentioned in your rejection letter were related to the steps/results you have done or got, you may resubmit with the missing information. In any case, it’s always a good idea to double-check with the journal office first.

Another possibility is that the evaluations indicate that you should categorize your work differently. This implies you’ll have to completely rewrite your work to meet the author’s requirements for the new category.

6. Take it as a learning experience

Consider what you can take away from the experience.  Why do you need to do this?  What is about your research that grabs your interest? It can help you move forward if you remind yourself of your underlying motivations. When you’re ready, consider what you can learn from the experience.  

Is there any way you can make your work stronger or clearer, or utilize it to spark new ideas? This isn’t a self-criticism exercise. Rejection is an indication that you’re challenging yourself. You will not receive rejections if you stay totally within your comfort zone and do not take any chances, but neither will you grow.

Try not to get caught up in the details and instead focus on the larger picture. You should normally wait a day or two to hear detailed remarks from reviewers, especially when dealing with difficult rejections: submerging yourself in such comments when you are not ready might be unhelpful.

Peer review is a great procedure, but it is also inherently subjective, which means that rejection might just be a case of bad luck.

Conclusion

You might try resubmitting to another journal, but make sure you make all of the necessary changes first. The editors of the journal to which you’re resubmitting are typically happy to get a manuscript that has already been examined and updated, which is why it’s a good idea to use paper editing services.

It’s critical that your document be edited and checked for inconsistencies in context, grammatical errors, misspelled words, and structural issues. TrueEditors offers journal editing services. If you use all of the helpful feedback, there’s no way your work will be rejected!

Most of our journal papers have been rejected many times, and that’s fine! But the most essential thing is to keep questioning and changing your work in response to the journal’s editors’ feedback. Keep in mind that even the finest articles get rejected.

Part of the reason for this might be because your article was allocated to reviewers with unrelated expertise, reviewers who are poor at reviewing, or reviewers who just do not have the time to do so.

It’s not the end of the world if your paper is turned down. It’s bound to get published in a good journal with the best paper editing services, a little dedication, and hard work!

Check out our website for journal editing services at an affordable price! –Click here!

Thanks and Regards,

Isabell S.

The TrueEditors Team

Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn